Find every barrier, not just the ones a scanner can see.
An audit that tells you what's failing, which WCAG success criterion it violates, how severe it is, and exactly what to change — written for the people who have to fix it.
Automated tools catch a slice of the problem and quietly certify the rest.
Scanners are good at what they're good at: missing alt attributes, contrast ratios, absent labels. They cannot tell you whether alt text is meaningful, whether focus order follows the visual layout, whether a custom dropdown announces its state, or whether a keyboard user can escape your modal. Those are the failures that block real people, and they require a human, a keyboard, and a screen reader.
An audit that only reports scanner output produces a false sense of safety — and a conformance claim you can't defend.
Signs you need this
- You've never had an accessibility evaluation, or the last one was a scanner PDF
- A deadline, contract, or complaint requires evidence of conformance
- Your team asks "are we compliant?" and nobody can answer with specifics
- A redesign is about to launch and no one has tested it with assistive technology
Four passes, because one method never catches everything.
Automated scanning
Full-site crawling for breadth — contrast, missing labels, structural errors, and duplicate patterns across thousands of pages. This is where we find scale, not nuance.
Manual code and interaction review
Criterion-by-criterion review of representative page templates and every interactive component: navigation, modals, tabs, accordions, carousels, date pickers, and form validation.
Assistive technology testing
Real screen reader passes on desktop and mobile, keyboard-only operation, 200% zoom and 400% reflow, and high-contrast and reduced-motion modes.
Task-based journey testing
The flows that matter — apply, purchase, schedule, pay, contact — completed end to end the way a user would, rather than evaluated page by page.
Deliverables you can hand to a developer, a vendor, or counsel.
Findings report
Every issue mapped to its WCAG success criterion and level, with severity, affected templates, reproduction steps, and a recommended fix.
Prioritized roadmap
Findings sequenced by user impact and effort, grouped into phases with owners — not a 400-row spreadsheet handed over without a plan.
Executive summary
A plain-language read on posture and risk for leadership, with a defensible statement of where you stand today.
Component inventory
Which shared components cause which findings, so fixing a handful of them resolves issues across the whole site at once.
Vendor findings
A separate, citable list of failures owned by third-party platforms, written so you can send it to the vendor as a formal request.
Retest and verification
After remediation, a verification pass confirming each finding is resolved — your evidence that the work actually landed.
What we audit besides the website.
Accessibility obligations follow the service, not the platform. An audit that stops at HTML pages leaves most organizations' largest gaps untouched.
- Public website & microsites
- Web applications & portals
- Native mobile apps
- PDFs & downloadable documents
- Online forms
- Email templates
- Video & captioning
- Third-party embeds
- Design systems
- Intranets
An audit is only useful if someone acts on it.
We scope audits alongside the remediation that follows, so findings arrive in a form your team or your vendor can actually execute against — not as a report that gets filed and cited a year later as evidence you knew.
See Remediation →